Escobar & Associates
813.875.5100
Speak to an attorney 24 hours a day free consultations

When can police use deadly force on a fleeing suspect?

The recent incident from another state in which a man apparently fleeing from a police officer was killed when the officer fired his pistol at him has made headlines nationally. One of the underlying questions invoked by the shooting is under what circumstances a police officer may use deadly force in general, and in particular against a fleeing suspect.

These questions have been addressed by the U.S. Supreme Court in two cases. We will briefly examine each of them below.

When is the use of deadly force by police appropriate? The Supreme Court considered this question in the case of Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989). In it, the Court held that the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (protecting individuals against unreasonable searches and seizures) requires the use of deadly force to be subject to whether the officer's conduct was "objectively reasonable."

The standard of objectivity is whether a reasonable police officer at that time and place, and considering factors such as the severity of the crime at issue, whether the suspect poses an immediate threat to the safety of the police officer or others, and whether the suspect is actively resisting or attempting to evade arrest, would have used deadly force. These factors must also be coupled with consideration of the need for police to often make immediate decisions about how much force to use in any given situation.

When can police officers shoot at fleeing individuals?  The Supreme Court addressed this question in the case of Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985). The Court again applied the U.S. Constitution’s Fourth Amendment and held that the question of the use of deadly force must be balanced between the intrusion against the suspect's individual rights versus the government's interest in effective law enforcement. The test boils down to the issue of whether the police officer has probable cause to believe that the fleeing suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or to others.

Both of these cases apply standards to the questions of when deadly force may be used, but in each case the specific facts and circumstances must be considered in applying those standards. This is the uniform treatment that law enforcement must use in Florida and every other state in the country.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
  • Martindale-Hubbell | Top rated lawyer in Tampa | Richard Escobar | For Ethical Standards and Legal Ability | Martindale-Hubbell Top rated lawyer
  • Top Lawyers 2016 | Richard Escobar
  • Top Lawyers 2016 | Dino Michaels
  • Highest Possible Rating in Both Legal Ability & Ethical Standards | AV |AV Preeminent | Richard Escobar | 2016
  • Judicial Education | AV | AV Preeminent | Richard Escobar | 2016
  • CLIENT | DISTINCTION AWARD | Dino mike Michaels, Esq. | Recognized for Excellence | Quality of Service | Overall Value | Responsiveness | Communication Ability
  • 15 | YEAR | Anniversary | Proudly Serving | the Community | Since 2001 | Dino Mike Michaels

Office Location

Escobar & Associates
2917 W. Kennedy Boulevard
Suite 100
Tampa, FL 33609

Phone: 813-513-0274
Fax: 813.877.6590
Tampa Law Office Map