ESCOBAR AND ASSOCIATES ANNOUCEMENT REGARDING COVID-19

Escobar and Associates Attorneys at Law remains open during the COVID-19 Coronavirus pandemic. Legal services are defined as “essential” within the Stay at Home Order executed by Florida Governor, Ron DeSantis. We remain committed to providing uninterrupted legal services to all clients. We also remain dedicated to the health and safety of our clients and staff. Within the office, our firm has already implemented protocols to keep clients and staff safe during this crisis. We understand as criminal defense attorneys how crucial it is for our attorneys and staff to remain available 24 hours a day, seven days a week to provide legal services for clients in need.

Your pursuit of justice starts here!

Speak to an attorney 24 hours a day free consultations

Email Us & Get Help
Today

U.S. Supreme Court considers felon’s firearm possession rights

| Feb 26, 2015 | Felonies

Recently we posted about a decision of the Florida Supreme Court which would allow a convicted felon to use a firearm for self-defense under the state’s “stand your ground” rule. Now, the U.S. Supreme Court is considering the case of a Florida man, regarding the question of whether a person convicted of a felony can transfer his firearms to the custody of someone else if he cannot regain possession of them himself.

The case, Henderson v. United States, concerns a man, who was convicted of selling illegal drugs in Florida in 2006. He has since completed his sentence.

Before his conviction, Henderson had voluntarily surrendered his collection of firearms instead of waiting for the federal government to seize them after the conviction, which means that legally the firearms, which are still in the custody of the FBI, remain his property. 

The issue before the court is the apparent conflict between a federal law and federal rules of procedure. The law prohibits convicted felons from possessing firearms, including controlling firearms through others. The rules, however, direct the government to return property to its owner once all criminal proceedings have been concluded. Henderson is arguing that he should be allowed to transfer the firearms to a third party that he knows, such as his wife, or his neighbor.

Attorneys for the federal government argue that such a transfer would constitute “constructive possession” of firearms by Henderson, that the law should not allow such a transfer, and that the government should retain possession of the weapons.

The case may be of limited utility in its scope. The key fact is that Henderson did not wait for the government to seize his weapons; had he done so, they would no longer be his property and the discrepancy between the federal law and the federal rules would not have arisen for the Court to consider.

But if the Court rules in favor of Henderson, the decision may open a possibility for those facing federal felony charges to voluntarily surrender their firearms before conviction, and then exercise at least some control over the disposition of those firearms once they have completed their sentence.

Source: SunHerald, “Felon can have his crossbow; Supreme Court to rule on rest of arsenal,” Michael Doyle, Feb. 19, 2015

  • Martindale-Hubbell | Top rated lawyer in Tampa | Richard Escobar | For Ethical Standards and Legal Ability | Martindale-Hubbell Top rated lawyer
  • Top Lawyers 2016 | Richard Escobar
  • Top Lawyers 2016 | Dino Michaels
  • Highest Possible Rating in Both Legal Ability & Ethical Standards | AV |AV Preeminent | Richard Escobar | 2016
  • Judicial Education | AV | AV Preeminent | Richard Escobar | 2016
  • CLIENT | DISTINCTION AWARD | Dino mike Michaels, Esq. | Recognized for Excellence | Quality of Service | Overall Value | Responsiveness | Communication Ability
  • 15 | YEAR | Anniversary | Proudly Serving | the Community | Since 2001 | Dino Mike Michaels
  • 10 Best 2018 | Richard Escobar | Client Satisfaction | American Institute Of Criminal Law Attorneys

Archives

Email Us & Get Help
Today

FindLaw Network