ESCOBAR AND ASSOCIATES ANNOUCEMENT REGARDING COVID-19

Escobar and Associates Attorneys at Law remains open during the COVID-19 Coronavirus pandemic. Legal services are defined as “essential” within the Stay at Home Order executed by Florida Governor, Ron DeSantis. We remain committed to providing uninterrupted legal services to all clients. We also remain dedicated to the health and safety of our clients and staff. Within the office, our firm has already implemented protocols to keep clients and staff safe during this crisis. We understand as criminal defense attorneys how crucial it is for our attorneys and staff to remain available 24 hours a day, seven days a week to provide legal services for clients in need.

Your pursuit of justice starts here!

Speak to an attorney 24 hours a day free consultations

Email Us & Get Help
Today

When can police use deadly force on a fleeing suspect?

| Apr 14, 2015 | Felonies

The recent incident from another state in which a man apparently fleeing from a police officer was killed when the officer fired his pistol at him has made headlines nationally. One of the underlying questions invoked by the shooting is under what circumstances a police officer may use deadly force in general, and in particular against a fleeing suspect.

These questions have been addressed by the U.S. Supreme Court in two cases. We will briefly examine each of them below.

When is the use of deadly force by police appropriate? The Supreme Court considered this question in the case of Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989). In it, the Court held that the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (protecting individuals against unreasonable searches and seizures) requires the use of deadly force to be subject to whether the officer’s conduct was “objectively reasonable.”

The standard of objectivity is whether a reasonable police officer at that time and place, and considering factors such as the severity of the crime at issue, whether the suspect poses an immediate threat to the safety of the police officer or others, and whether the suspect is actively resisting or attempting to evade arrest, would have used deadly force. These factors must also be coupled with consideration of the need for police to often make immediate decisions about how much force to use in any given situation.

When can police officers shoot at fleeing individuals?  The Supreme Court addressed this question in the case of Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985). The Court again applied the U.S. Constitution’s Fourth Amendment and held that the question of the use of deadly force must be balanced between the intrusion against the suspect’s individual rights versus the government’s interest in effective law enforcement. The test boils down to the issue of whether the police officer has probable cause to believe that the fleeing suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or to others.

Both of these cases apply standards to the questions of when deadly force may be used, but in each case the specific facts and circumstances must be considered in applying those standards. This is the uniform treatment that law enforcement must use in Florida and every other state in the country.

  • Martindale-Hubbell | Top rated lawyer in Tampa | Richard Escobar | For Ethical Standards and Legal Ability | Martindale-Hubbell Top rated lawyer
  • Top Lawyers 2016 | Richard Escobar
  • Top Lawyers 2016 | Dino Michaels
  • Highest Possible Rating in Both Legal Ability & Ethical Standards | AV |AV Preeminent | Richard Escobar | 2016
  • Judicial Education | AV | AV Preeminent | Richard Escobar | 2016
  • CLIENT | DISTINCTION AWARD | Dino mike Michaels, Esq. | Recognized for Excellence | Quality of Service | Overall Value | Responsiveness | Communication Ability
  • 15 | YEAR | Anniversary | Proudly Serving | the Community | Since 2001 | Dino Mike Michaels
  • 10 Best 2018 | Richard Escobar | Client Satisfaction | American Institute Of Criminal Law Attorneys

Archives

Email Us & Get Help
Today

FindLaw Network