Escobar & Associates - Tampa Criminal Defense Lawyer


Escobar and Associates Attorneys at Law remains open during the COVID-19 Coronavirus pandemic. Legal services are defined as “essential” within the Stay at Home Order executed by Florida Governor, Ron DeSantis. We remain committed to providing uninterrupted legal services to all clients. We also remain dedicated to the health and safety of our clients and staff. Within the office, our firm has already implemented protocols to keep clients and staff safe during this crisis. We understand as criminal defense attorneys how crucial it is for our attorneys and staff to remain available 24 hours a day, seven days a week to provide legal services for clients in need.

Your pursuit of justice starts here!

Escobar & Associates - Tampa Criminal Defense Lawyer
Speak to an attorney 24 hours a day free consultations

Email Us & Get Help

US. Supreme Court to review Florida death penalty case

| Oct 4, 2015 | Felonies

In Florida, as in many other states, the death penalty is a legal sanction that can be applied in cases of capital murder. But who gets to make the decision – the jury, or the judge? That is the crux of a Florida death penalty case that the U.S. Supreme Court will be considering during his current term.

The case – Hurst v. Florida – arose from the defendant being found guilty of murder in 2000, whereupon he was sentenced to death. That initial sentence went before the Florida Supreme Court, which sent it back to the trial court for further consideration of whether the defendant’s alleged intellectual disability meant that he was disqualified for the death penalty. Upon rehearing, the trial court once again sentenced the defendant to death, and this time the Florida Supreme Court upheld the decision.

Upon agreeing to hear the case, the US Supreme Court stated that it’s sole question for consideration is whether Florida’s death sentencing scheme violates the sixth or eighth amendments to the U.S. Constitution in light of an earlier US Supreme Court decision from 2002 (Ring v. Arizona). That case held that finding whether a defendant meets the qualification for the death penalty is a function of the jury and not a judge. In the Florida case, although the jury recommended the death penalty, but failed to make clear what factors supported that decision, meaning that the judge in the case decided that qualification instead.

It was perhaps the perceived reluctance of the Florida Supreme Court to apply the standard set forth in Ring that led the US Supreme Court to accept the appeal. Depending upon how the Supreme Court rules in this case, criminal defense law firms will be paying attention because it may have a bearing on other death penalty cases in Florida as well.

Source: Newsweek, “Five Important Cases to Watch in the New Supreme Court Term,” Elizabeth Slattery, Sept. 26, 2015

Secondary source: U.S. News & World Report, “Supreme Court to Take on Florida’s Death Penalty System,” Tierney Sneed, March 9, 2015

  • Martindale-Hubbell | Top rated lawyer in Tampa | Richard Escobar | For Ethical Standards and Legal Ability | Martindale-Hubbell Top rated lawyer
  • Top Lawyers 2016 | Richard Escobar
  • Top Lawyers 2016 | Dino Michaels
  • Highest Possible Rating in Both Legal Ability & Ethical Standards | AV |AV Preeminent | Richard Escobar | 2016
  • Judicial Education | AV | AV Preeminent | Richard Escobar | 2016
  • CLIENT | DISTINCTION AWARD | Dino mike Michaels, Esq. | Recognized for Excellence | Quality of Service | Overall Value | Responsiveness | Communication Ability
  • 15 | YEAR | Anniversary | Proudly Serving | the Community | Since 2001 | Dino Mike Michaels
  • 10 Best 2018 | Richard Escobar | Client Satisfaction | American Institute Of Criminal Law Attorneys


Email Us & Get Help

FindLaw Network